Constitutional Lessons from Europe
نویسندگان
چکیده
All legal transplants are problematic, constitutional transplants especially so. And constitutional transplants for federal systems are among the most problematic of all. Still, especially in light of the apparent derailing of the EU’s Draft Constitutional Treaty, the question of the relevance of EU constitution-making for constitution-making in federal-style systems elsewhere seems nothing less than compelling. Two problematic themes emerge most forcefully from the EU constitutional adventure just witnessed. One is the utter importance of a sense of identity, and the other is the profound challenge of satisfactorily organizing the processes of democratic participation.
منابع مشابه
Adversary System Experiment in Continental Europe: Several Lessons from the Italian Experience
In order to promote efficiency and realize democracy ideal, Italy transplanted adversary system in 1988. Because of rampancy of organized crimes and compulsory prosecution system and material truth ideal, reformer’s effort was nibbled away by constitutional court of Italy. In 1999, the legislature of Italy amended Article 111 in Constitution which formed the constitutional basis of adversary sy...
متن کاملLessons from Mazibuko : Persistent Inequality
This essay will explore the idea that in the wake of the Constitutional Court’s decision in Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg,1 activists who are committed to dismantling persistent racial and class inequality should weigh carefully the costs and benefits of using rights-based litigation as a strategy to advance their interests. In putting forward that general idea, I want to make two central po...
متن کاملAmerican Lessons Learned – European Future Rethought
The most notable feature of the notion of states of emergency is the assumption of their unpredictability. As such, it has been both normatively and positively deeply embedded in constitutional thought and practice to this day. However, notwithstanding its unavoidable advantages, I try to claim that it represents a somewhat outdated concept that stands in opposition to the normative development...
متن کاملAn empirical analysis of constitutional review voting in the polish constitutional tribunal, 2003–2014
Different theories have been developed, mainly in the context of the United States, to explain judicial decision-making. In this respect, there is an important ongoing debate over whether judges are guided by the law or by personal ideology. The analysis of the decision-making in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal seems to support the existence of some party alignment. It is to say that judicia...
متن کامل